Friday, December 19, 2014

UV too


 311 8 1 428

‘British Victims of Investing in Malaysia’ in Court

 | December 19, 2014
Ex-Umno Treasurer among directors of company which allegedly defrauded British investors.
bvim_mahkama_300KUALA LUMPUR: After three years of struggling for justice, the British Victims of Investing in Malaysia (BVIM) are surprised that Sivalingam Thechinamoorthy, the managing director of Doxport Technologies Sdn Bhd, will be the only one finally facing a trial at the Sessions Court in Petaling Jaya on charges of “Criminal Breach of Trust”.
BVIM alleges that they have been cheated of RM13.3 million.
Other directors of Doxport, according to BVIM, are ex-Treasurer of Umno Azim Zabidi and a Gurmeet Kaur.
The criminal case investigated by the Royal Malaysian Police and brought by the Malaysian Public Prosecutor against Sivalingam will be heard at Session 1 Court, Petaling Jaya, starting on 22 December 2014.
Apparently, over 20 British MPs and members of the House of Lords have supported the British investors in their attempt to bring, what the investors allege is “fraud”, to the Malaysian Courts.
Next month, from 19 to 22 January 2015, also sees the civil case brought by the British investors, alleging ‘fraud, deceit and/or fraudulent misrepresentations and conspiracy’ against Doxport and its directors Azim Zabidi, Sivalingam and Gurmeet.
It will be heard at the High Court of Malaya in Kuala Lumpur, according to BVIM. “Lord Ahmed of Rotherham in the UK Parliament will be attending the civil case as a witness for the British investors.”

Thursday, July 3, 2014

UV please help

Litigation TAB against TAED by Jslm & UV

Attention members of JSLM and UV (to be revived) Appeal for Litigation Fund of RM2m

We all know what do JSLM and UV stand for here.

There may be thousands of members of JSLM and hundreds of UV members in Sabah.

I have been proposing here in facebook that we initiate litigation against those parties involved with excessive development of the only left pristine beach at the Tanjung Aru after the authorities under BN/UMNO had neglected the Tanjung Aru Beach (TAB) especially Prince Philip Park (PPP) which was created in 1959.

If we go through those records of maintenance of TAB since 1963, I think Musa Aman spent the most money in 2013 for the celebration of golden jubilee of Malaysia within a very short period.  It was incurred because he wanted the PM to launch his pet project of land grabbing of what he called Tanjung Aru Eco Development (TAED) in the disguise of rejuvenating the much neglected only good sandy beach left in Kota Kinabalu.  Musa Aman made some promises to the residents and the consumers plus the environmentalists that his intention was to improve the vast area for the public.

Those were Musa Aman’s words but soon other “animals” like TAEDSB appears on the scene which he claimed is a wholly own state Agency but headed but an outsider like Victor Paul who I believe has his own idea to enrich himself.   Can a non civil servant be the Chief Executive Officer of TAEDSB?  In this case TAEDSB is a private company linked by a tiny thread to the State Government.   Musa Aman must exhibit these records to prove what he and Victor said are relevant.

Other people have jump in band wagon of Musa Aman like President of SUCCC, YB Christina Liew and John Lo trying to paint a favourable picture of a public project when the modus operandi is to grab land.  In such process, we will lose our only pristine sandy beach left in Kota Kinabalu which is a very important historic heritage.

So far the signs are indicative of land grabbing of as much as 600 acres worth RM25billion.

We must stop this hideous project because we will only get a commercial area plus a water front after the massive reclamation of the sea of about 100 acres.  Nothing would be left for the ordinary people although the promise is that public would have access to the sea front but at what costs?

The promise of thousands of jobs is only good on papers as temptation for us to accept TAED and I believe the hotels and resorts could be white elephant within the next 5 years. 

There are people who are trying very hard to stop the TAED project but Musa Aman would not listen and would likely bull doze the plan as he had done so in other earlier projects against public interests.  I believe some of the concrete jungle projects in Kota Kinabalu would be abandoned once it is completed soon.

So I believe the only last resort to stop the TAED is by litigation which may cost any thing up to RM2m to complete the whole process including Appeals as there are multiple cases to be filed.

UV and JSLM members are urged to support the Litigation Fund raising drive as pet projects to conserve environment for this and future generations.  UV and JSLM members and leaders can appeal to the parent bodies for such fund to further our business in global tourism and trade and conservation of nature is of paramount importance to sustain good business practice.  I think the State can earn more with a good image by keeping TAB as pristine and as natural as it is to be a nature’s icon.  Once TAB is defaced by TAED, everything is gone.

Once UV and JSLM make an impact to stop the TAED project, we can then adopt this pristine beach as our icon in public venue.  Other global companies can also participate in the move to stop TAED in TAG 2.0.

Go for TAG 2.0 in litigation portion.


Joshua Y. C. Kong     6013-8394513

Saturday, April 12, 2014

1. in search of UVTI






While UV was in "business" until December, 2013,  I used to receive text messages from all numbers unknown to me but after early January after the seizure, no more text messages from sms to me, hence dead SILENCE, and why?







 


Karim (left) with Joshua Kong earlier

First thing to do now is to lodge a Police Report already prepared by me but it cannot be one man show to get result and Karim would have to bear some major blame for the crisis. If later found that the scheme lack legality, Karim can be in HOT soup.  Let wait and see, what is next after the Police Report.




Dear Victims, 
UVAC has no fund to find the answer for all the members and I am working for myself and those under me and if I can get the money, then others would not get their shares of refund of investments.

So all victims of UV, please play your role in one way or another, and even RM50 per members [more investment pay more for expenses] would help and Karim is asking RM150 and not focussed on this claim.  I have done so much for the cause since January, 2014. When we get the answer and then get the money, then we can see the fruit of our hard work. Joshua


All visitors here can help to find answer to the missing UVTI as an international effort.  Thank you.

 



 






 


1. Hilton, 2. Royal Caribbean International 3. Costa Crusing Italian Style

4. Best Western 5. Ibis Hotel   6.  Utell Hotels R Resorts 7.  American Airlines

8. United 9. Holiday Inn Hotel Resorts 10.  United Airlines 11. Delta Airline

 12. KLM  13. Walt Disney 14.  Sheraton Hotel & Resorts 15.  Jet*

16.   Hyatt 17.  Palace Resorts  18.  Sinapore Airlines  19.  Qantas Airline

20.  Universal Booking 21.  Universal Flight 22.  Universal leisure

23.  Carnival – the fun shops
Who are these global companies?  Partners of Universal Ventures Travel Inc.?

 See the faces of the TWO bosses who had gone SILENT.


UV – in search of missing Universal Ventures Travel Inc.

Brief background of universal ventures travel inc. (UVTI)
In a glossy handout UVTI  declared itself an legitimate global company based in New York, USA with all required licences in the global travel and tourism web-based operations offering the cheapest rates of flights and hotel rooms globally.

Vision:
UVTI has also declared its vision of stock listing in the New York Stock Exchange in 2016 and all members who join prior to 2016 would be issued its preferential share certificate for each lot of investment which matures in 160 working days with the highest return of 360% for the highest class of investment “Universal”.

Modus Operandi
Each member would be allocated a webpage which record extensively the performance of each members according to the performance of the UVTI and each member webpage would be updated every week on Monday for the previous week’s dividends which would be recorded in E-wallet (initially) and later in S-Wallet.  Withdrawal from the E-wallet was possible in the early period when UVTI started its business but later increasing difficult conditions for withdrawals were introduced for unknown reasons like Liberty Reserve.

Period of operation but seized

UVTI was started in late 2012 offering global membership and then it was unfortunately closed by an order which reads as “This domain name has been seized by the United States Global Illicit Financial Team in accordance with a seizure warrant obtained by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and issued pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. & 982(a)(1) by the United State District Court for the Southern District of New York. [together with 5 logos].

Logo of Seizure
The logo of this seizure of domain name was simply pasted over all UVTI’s official websites and webpages of members without any defined reference to the legality of such closure or seizure as to what investigation or litigation by the authorities concerned.


Suspicion abound.

Without reference to any legal prosecution against UVTI by the authorities concerned, how can the seizure be legal?  If not legal, it is suspected that it can be the collaboration of the owners of the UVTI, the district Attorney’s Office and the hackers for obvious reasons.

Consequences of Seizure

How can this seizure be justified for UVTI if the legal process is not underway?  If there is a seizure, the due process of law would take effect by charging the owners of the UVTI plus appointment of receivers or liquidators as there are lots of fund still under control of the UVTI and its numerous partners as listed in the glossy handout.  So members should deserve a distribution of the residue of the fund of UVTI and get back much of the money.

What a conclusion to missing UVTI?

It cannot be silence from all concerned.  The members demand to know the answer to the missing  UVTI.

Prepared by Joshua Y. C. Kong  12/4/14